South Korea To Categorize Dogs as Livestock?
Is the world going to the dogs or are the poor dogs going the way of the world? The answer is up in the air, at least in Seoul, South Korea, where an appeal has been made to the central government to propose categorization of dogs as livestock in order to properly regulate the trade of dog meat and strengthen sanitation inspections.

The purpose of the proposal is to address the absence of regulations concerning the sale of dog meat, which is considered a delicacy in Korea. City officials claim that proper categorization of dogs as livestock will force things to improve.
“The real problem is, we cannot regulate the sanitation process of how dog meat is served due to the lack of regulations. We will have a series of public hearings to discuss the issue as it’s a necessary step,” said one official from the Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG).
The way things are, dogs are considered the same as donkeys, rabbits, horses and deer; that is, not livestock such as beef and chicken. This permits mass breeding, butchering and serving of dog meat in restaurants, but does not allow authorities to apply the same regulations regarding livestock to dog meat.
Animal rights groups and dog lovers have loudly and openly criticized the treatment of dogs in South Korea. In 2001, a law was proposed to set up proper regulations concerning dog meat and its categorization as “livestock,” but it was scrapped due to pressure from animal rights protesters.
Dog meat is considered a natural product. Whatever this may indicate for a lack for better laws, this situation is not likely to change soon. For now, the way the laws are set up the authorities can only take a legal action against those who butcher dogs in a brutal way or cause pollution to the environment during the slaughter process.
Is the world going to the dogs?
What do you think?
By MDeeDubroff on 02-09-2009


Comment by acidchalk
September 2nd, 2009 at 7:14 pm
About damn time!
Comment by Disgusted
September 2nd, 2009 at 8:07 pm
Barbaric.
Comment by Guitar Tuition Reviews
September 2nd, 2009 at 3:15 pm
I thought it was Livestock in most Asian countrys?
Comment by eag
September 2nd, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Dogs have been known to eat people. I say, eat them back! That ought to teach them a lesson.
Comment by pacat
September 3rd, 2009 at 1:08 am
YUCH!!!!! COUNT ME OUT.IF I AM STARVING I COULD EAT A RAT EASIER THEN A DOG OR CAT. I SAY CUT THE POPULATION BACK.JUST DON'T MANE ANYMORE BABIES TILL THE POPOULATION IS UNDER CONTROL
Comment by abcc
September 3rd, 2009 at 3:12 am
Guitar, how misinformed can you be? Go check the world map and see how big Asia is before u spout such generalisatio nonsense.
Comment by JM1
September 3rd, 2009 at 3:31 am
Only a true coward would eat man's best friend. I would love to get a chance to show everyone of them how cowardly they really are when faced with the same cruelness that they gladly inflict on highly social and intelligent creatures. Save the crap about "their culture" and how the animals are raised differently than pet animals. To call this cultural, is to insult Korea, or any other country. To believe that the animals nature is somehow changed, because they are mistreated is foolish. Basically, dog eaters are no better than child molesters. They use the trust and good nature of their victims to inflict harm on them for their own selfish pleasure. This is a joke. Their is no proper and humane method to breed, raise, and slaughter companion animals for food. At best, it makes a very bad situation a little better for its poor victims.
Comment by Pred
September 3rd, 2009 at 5:51 am
While I don't agree with eating them I have to agree with the reasons for declaring them livestock. The dogs are going to be eaten either way, at least this way there is a chance that their mass breeding is healthier, and there is a lower chance of human illness from consumption.
If the dog is going to be eaten anyway they can at least make sure no one gets sick from eating it. You aren't going to change the views of a large portion of the asian continent by telling them what they've always done is wrong.
Comment by JM1
September 3rd, 2009 at 10:19 am
Firstly, they have not "always" done this. Secondly, it really is not a very large portion of the continent, now is it? It is mostly males of certain "social" status, and lame tourists. Thirdly, I believe that everyone who eats dog should get sick, and hopefully die. Perhaps, this classification truly only serves the scum, and only somewhat benefits the animals indirectly. Thanks for setting me straight on that Pred.
Comment by Anonymiss
September 3rd, 2009 at 11:16 am
It stays an animal, it stays prey to other species. It's stays meat.
In S-Korea there are animal friends and dog owners as well. It's a sad situation for them, but it's not as if they are forced to eat that meat.
But if I'd have to choose, eat meat of unknown origin, uncertain about if it's good meat, healthy and so on, then I do have much rather regulations on the dogs as on the livestock.
To Indians, the western culture is horrible too, if you look at the amount of cows we eat.
It's all about different cultures AGAIN.
Comment by JM1
September 3rd, 2009 at 11:32 am
Not about different cultures with dog eating. Maybe, for the Indians, not for this vanity sport. Let us get this straight, the human filth that participates in this practice wants you to identify it as "cultural," because it serves their purpose. This is an issue for Asia. This has nothing to do with the west, because for whatever reason, even the lowest of the low in the west generally won't consume dog meat. They will do other rotten things, however, but they don't do them because of their "culture." They do bad things because they are disgusting wastes of genetic material. Just because a bad thing happens in a certain place, that does not mean it a "cultural" event. Does much of Asia not have a treasured history of Buddhism? Obviously. Now that is "culture," and a culture directly opposed to this abominable practice.
Comment by Mike
September 3rd, 2009 at 2:03 pm
NUKE THEM ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL BLOODY KOREAN FREAKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!ROT IN HELL -MANS FRIEND FOOD!!!!!!!!!!-DIE ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
Comment by Pippos
September 3rd, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Actually they are already considered livestocks. They eat every living being, they don't deserve to be considered humans and can burn alive for the rest of their miserable life
Comment by pippos
September 3rd, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Don't they have troubles with atomic bombs? well, they can use nuclear weapons against themselves and set us free
Comment by Casey Marion
September 3rd, 2009 at 3:50 pm
Dog meat, pig meat, cow…..what's the f-ing difference?
No one in Korea is eating poodles. They have a certain breed that they've been breeding for food for a LONG time. They aren't eating house pets.
Why not regulate it?
However, I must point out that regulating anything in Korea is a joke. The Korean Food and Drug Administration or KFDA, exists to do nothing other than put some foreigners at ease when they eat out.
There is no sanitation code in this country, no restaurant inspections, etc. So, putting dog meat under govn't scrutiny is about the same as not regulating dog meat.
It's all about creating a needless bureaucracy to boost employment.
Comment by pacat
September 3rd, 2009 at 4:56 pm
GOOD DRIEF!!!!!! I MUST ADMIT THAT MANY MANY YEARS AGO ,WHEN I LIVED IN THE PHOLIPPINES,I ATE DOG.I DIDN'T KNOW WHAT IT WAS AT THAT TIME, WHEN I FOUND OUT ,MY BROTHER AND I WERE SICK FOR A WEEK. I COULDN'T BELEAVE THAT ANYONE WOULD HAVE THESE DOGS AS PETS THEN TURN AROUND AND KILL THEM. EVEN THOUGH THIS FAMILY,AND THEY WERE RATHER WEALTHY,RAISED AND ATE THIER DOGS,THEY WEREE THE ONLY ONES WE KNEW THAT DID.
EATING CATS IS JUST AS POPULAR AS EATING DOGS IN THE ORIENT.YOU DON'T HEAR MUCH ABOUT THAT THOUGH.GO THROUGH MOST ORIENTAL FOOD MARKETS AND YOU WILL SEE CAGES FILLED TO THE TOP WITH CATS.THEY AREN'T SELLING THEM FOR PETS I CAN ASSURE YOU.
Comment by pacat
September 3rd, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I HATE TO TELL YOU THIS,DOG EATERS WILL EAT POODLES,PUGS AND WHATEVER ELSE THEY CAN FIND.SOME TIMES THE MORE EXSPENSIVE THE ANIMAL THE MORE IT IS CONSIDERED A DELICOUSY.
PARDON SPELLING
Comment by Vinessa
September 3rd, 2009 at 5:49 pm
Thank you for speaking out!!!!
Comment by Iris
September 3rd, 2009 at 11:51 pm
So now they eat dogs, then next they can eat human too???? What wrong with them! STOP ABUSING ANIMAL!!!!!! Dogs are "man's best friend"!!! I dont think you will eat you friend right!!!!!
Comment by Jay
September 4th, 2009 at 1:56 am
The reason people do not eat the meat of carnivores is really simple its a natural health protection.
You see for omnivore's like ourselves are biology is more similar to meat eaters than plant eaters and as such we are more susceptible to catching diseases and parasites from eating the meat of another meat eater.
The same goes for eating the meat of another omnivore. Scientists think that a lot of diseases we have got have come from eating other omnivores and carnivores especially "bush" meat like primates and monkeys.
A simple example is this, pigs are omnivores yet we eat there meat i.e. pork and ham. Under cooked pork and ham can give you tapeworms a parasite that that lives in your gut another omnivores gut.
Other meat like beef and fish because of the difference in biology i.e. ones a herbivore and the other are fish are so different that we can safely with a bit of caution to eat raw.
But not fowl i.e. birds as mostly either carnivores or omnivores(chickens and turkeys).
So you see the reaction to eating the flesh of another carnivore/omnivore is not really a cultural one as such but a subconscious natural instinct one.
Hope that clears a few things up
-Jay
Comment by Rin
September 4th, 2009 at 2:04 am
dog, cow, bird, pig.. its all the same.
should Jewish people condemn those who eat pork?
should Indian people condemn everyone who eats beef?
should vegans or vegetarians denounce everyone who eats meat?
its all cultural differences. don't hate on your brothers and sister because their different. variety is the spice of life.
Comment by JM1
September 4th, 2009 at 2:27 am
Not "cultural." Dog eaters are a worthless lot. Their lives are void of virtue and value. They are brothers of no decent man. FOR ONE LAST TIME, PIGS, COWS, AND CHICKENS ARE NOT THE SAME AS DOGS. A DOG SEEKS OUT THE COMPANIONSHIP OF MAN, FOR MAN HAS CREATED THE COMPANION THAT IS THE DOG. CAN YOU ALL BE SO STUPID, AND/OR CORRUPT AS TO NOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE?
Comment by Milli
September 4th, 2009 at 10:32 pm
ok then. just how many times have you seen some article about a dog eating a person? we see more things about snakes eating people whole. one of the few reasons a dog would eat a person is 1) it was starving to death and appearantly the person isn't even trying to fight back, or 2) it has super freaky cujo rabbies.
what are korean's excuse for eating dogs? appearantly they taste 'good'.
sure. that's 'justice'.
frikkin' sicko.
Comment by Milli
September 4th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
it's nice to see someone who isn't looking at this in a hateful way, but, it's normal for Americans to be upset my this, dogs have been helping them and bringing them joy since they were made.
It's not all the same for us.
Comment by Milli
September 4th, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Calm down, they're just trying to put this in a way that everyone can be happy.
Every one has different view points on something like this. Yes dogs are wonderful sweet creatures who are very much loved in America, and then Korean's go and start treating them like live stock, of course we'll get mad, no one will blame you for it. But what about cows? Indians love them more than a person could ever love their dog, and we eat them every day because we consider them 'un-intelligent'.
So over-all, yes, eating dogs is very wrong. That's no reason to get mad at someone trying to make peace.
Comment by JM1
September 4th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
Absolutely wrong. Two of my great friends, both Korean, find this even more objectionable than I do. They hate being associated with this sick practice. One owns dogs, one does not. I do hate people who do indecent things, irrespective of their country of origin. Nothing wrong with that. The world needs more of it.
Comment by JM1
September 4th, 2009 at 11:38 pm
Well, cows are really dumb, but I don't eat them. They are, however, herd animals that do provide food to carnivores. A dog really is not a food animal in the natural universe. If an Indian were to call a cow eater a sick cowardly bastard, I certainly would not excuse cow eating as "cultural."
That being said, their condemnation would be based upon religious principles and my condemnation of dog eaters is based on common decency.
Frankly, if I ever catch a dogeater in the gym I will stretch him until something breaks, provided he has the guts to take to the mat. I guess you can call that my "culture."
Comment by Rin
September 7th, 2009 at 5:41 am
look, why can't you just just stop?
ranting and raving on the internet won't stop anyone from eating dog.
also, its not like they're going to see a lab and say, "well, that looks good, i'm going to eat it!" they have a special breed that they use~
personally, i don't think i would eat dog. but some people like it, and have been doing it for quite a while, so i believe it should be allowed. the only reason this is such a big issue is because many types of dogs have become domesticated and can be people's companions now. if dogs had never been domesticated, people wouldn't care. (unless they were being hunted until extinction. they people probably would.. ^^')
p.s. why can't people set aside their differences and let this die? there never will never be an agreement for something like this~~ arguing does nothing :3
Comment by JM1
September 8th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
Personally I would not abuse a child, but some people like it so it should be okay? After all, people have been doing it for a while. Maybe, the ugly kids don't get abused, so no problem? So, let us just put aside our differences and embrace NAMBLA, right? That is your logic, not mine. You cannot be serious with that kind of stupidity, right?
Comment by JM1
September 8th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
You cannot be serious. If someone endorses something barbaric, then there is plenty of reason to get mad at them. Save this hippie Gen Y crap for your Facebook moron friends.
Comment by Emily
September 8th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
FUC* YOU!
Comment by the hoff
September 27th, 2009 at 1:47 am
Eating dog in Korea is basically like North Americans eating cows. In India, cows are considered sacred, just like we in North America basically see dogs…so in all fairness, it is just a cultural difference. Stop being rude.
Comment by ...
November 5th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
You damn racist bastards… whats wrong with eating a dog? its just like eating a chicken/cow/pig. dogs are men's best friend? sure they are but that doesnt really mean anyting. and we asians don't eat EVERYTING you f-ing sterotypical morons! wow, that just shows how stupid and ignorant you guys are… jesus f-ing christ! man, you guys are stupid enought to say "they eat humans"? its obviously a f-ing crime… wow i cant believe how ignorant you f-ing morons are… probably f-ing rednecks… and we all know that abusing pretty much anything is a crime. I am an animal lover as well and i hate people who tortures animals… it is sad that some people torture dogs before killing them but YOU F-ING NORTH AMERICANS do the same thing to cows! i know it is wrong and they should stop abusing animal!
anyways, i have two words to say to you stupid ignorant people "f**k you!"