Comments on: Animal Torture Causes Wave of Anger

By: rosey

rosey — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:19:11 +0000

those kinds of abusive pieces of shiat should be skinned alive and resuscitated upon death so that they can die again and again. extreme? i dont think so. they deserve it for torturing a trusting, helpless, harmless animal. those people are worse than scum and anyone who thinks hurting an animal is funny and/or amusing deserves to burn in hell. amen.

By: elmo

elmo — Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:48:27 +0000

you are an effin tard you know that?

By: Jon

Jon — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 00:47:55 +0000

Get real. If you do even a small bit of research, you’ll find that as usual PETA was throwing around twisted facts. The animals PETA captured on film were not owned by Iams, but were simply housed in the same facility. The facility was (notice the was, as it has been shut down and Iams now uses it’s own privately held facilities) simply a place where companies could rent out space to house animals, although it was up to the individual companies to provide care - it was proven that Iams cared for their animals exceptionally well.

Iams now sponsors several programs run by the ASPCA and undergoes frequent investigation by their own choice from the ASPCA, the results of which can be found on their website.

PETA should not be trusted. They are a corrupted, extremely political group that will go to any lengths, including slandering and lying, to destroy any company they think is doing them harm. They are bogus.

By: Ari♥

Ari♥ — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:00:17 +0000

That’s pretty depressing.

It’s quite coincidental that I was telling my parents about a commercial about animal abuse and this story popped up.

That commercial made me cry both of the times I saw it.

By: matsui

matsui — Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:06:27 +0000

Because the person that dyed the cat was the doctor himself! muhuhuahahahhahaha