China to the US: Take Our Women!

An interesting piece of history was discovered in a document that the State Department’s historical office released. It was a conversation transcript between China’s Chairman Mao Zedong and US Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger.

kissinger-mao China to the US: Take Our Women! picture

“You know, China is a very poor country,” Mao said. “We don’t have much. What we have in excess is women. So if you want them we can give a few of those to you, some tens of thousands.”

Mao circled back to the offer a few minutes later. “Do you want our Chinese women?” he asked. “We can give you 10 million.”

Kissinger noted Mao was “improving his offer,” and the chairman is on record then saying, “We have too many women … They give birth to children and our children are too many.”

“It is such a novel proposition,” Kissinger replied. “We will have to study it.”

The conversation occurred in 1973 in Beijing, China and as far as we could find… the promised10 million Chinese women were not given to the US.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Buzz
  • Reddit
  • bodytext
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

RSS feed

40 Comments »

Comment by monsterCock
2008-02-15 14:27:21

i’ll take em..if the offer is still on the table
put em on my island..be lik emy own little harlem
although 10 mil maybe a bit too much

Comment by Trent Blurbo
2008-02-16 01:39:13

It will be like Harlem?

Comment by Bilbo T. Baggins
2008-02-16 02:38:16

I think he meant “Harem”

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by eaux
2008-02-16 03:20:06

I agree with you !
ha Ha!

 
Comment by Geoffrie G
2008-02-16 13:57:56

yeah, making your own little harlem is something altogether different lol

 
Comment by Fred
2008-02-19 02:59:42

10 Million is too much for me.

Comment by Fred
2008-02-19 03:00:09

Sike!

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by mod
2008-02-15 16:04:04

This conversation was taken out of context from the whole conversation. Mao was just saying that as a joke. Since the founding of PRC in 1949, Mao was the advocate behind liberating Chinese women from traditional roles. His famous slogan was “women hold up half of the sky.”

So after 20 years of liberation Chinese women were out of control like ginies out of bottle and rampaging China with their male comrade red guards. Also Mao’s wife Jiang Qing also formed her own faction in the govt and party trying to grab power from Mao. Out of frustration with the power struggle with his wife Mao said that as a joke to imply how much headache he was having in regard to women.

Mao also joked with Kissinger that how come he was so much shorter than his wife.

Comment by sue
2008-02-15 19:54:46

sue- loved your insight.. thanks!

 
Comment by Saul Flores
2008-02-16 00:16:46

I rarely find the comments more interesting than the article, however, this was a great response to the post.

 
Comment by Sun Tzu
2008-02-16 01:38:43

I love you all.. but if you don’t see the dialogue as being humorous in nature… and you actually believe the Chairman was going to ship out 10 million women…. seriously.

Comment by Tommy
2008-02-16 09:18:23

Why not? He murdered more then that.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by Maclover
2008-02-16 11:35:12

Well, maybe he was using one of the oldest and greatest of all known Chinese war strategies. Patience. Many Chinese Emperors and Overlords, when realizing they could not win a direct offensive, would “export” or allow the capture of strongly national women and breed out their enemies over a couple of generations. With the Chinese women teaching their children and grandchildren to be sympathetic and at times completely devoted to their mother/grandmothers homeland.

Then the Emperor, or his son, would take over that territory easily as a majority of the peoples were now willing to follow him.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
Comment by anon
2008-02-24 06:22:36

That is probably happening as we speak in the USA.

 
Comment by sukiewa
2008-03-12 14:57:58

That’s reminded me of what the US did to Mexico for Texas

 
 
 
Comment by fluencev6616
2008-03-08 02:08:21

en!imean yeah!
i like you guy

 
 
Comment by Allen
2008-02-15 16:39:17

…that’s…messed up…
on an unbelievile scale…(O_O)

 
Comment by eponymous
2008-02-16 00:18:36

Source?

Comment by Sun Tzu
2008-02-16 00:39:20

Source is AP

 
 
Comment by limadang.com
2008-02-16 00:23:13

WOw… amazing lols!

 
Comment by John C. Randolph
2008-02-16 00:29:45

This shows what a god damned thug Mao was. He considered it his prerogative to simply give people away like livestock.

-jcr

Comment by nameless
2008-02-16 01:17:25

Mr Randolph aka jcr, did you read the comments? the second one?

by the way, are you a citizen of USA?

Comment by Anon
2008-02-16 01:57:52

Nameless, get a life.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
Comment by John C. Randolph
2008-02-16 01:33:43

Yes, I saw the second comment, and I don’t find it credible. The man killed 77 million of the people he ruled. He was a depraved son of a bitch.

-jcr

 
Comment by cbo
2008-02-16 02:58:21

Chinese women are beautiful. “Deal. Final answer.”

 
Comment by Ogopogo
2008-02-16 03:25:53

Mao was an idiot. China has an overabundance of males (~30M) due to the ‘one child per family’ policy. Getting rid of 10M females would only make things much worse.

See: http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=china+surplus+males

Communists suck at planning for the future.

Comment by Trish
2008-02-16 03:57:16

I don’t think you get it. If you are trying to control the population, it is better to have more men than women.

Consider this.

1 man. 100 women. With good planning, the man could theoretically impregnate all the women and nearly double the population in a single year (or more than double it if some women have twins, triplets, etc).

Alternative:

100 men. 1 woman. The population can only grow by 1 (or 2 with twins, etc.).

Conclusion: Having less women limits the possibilities for population growth.

Comment by Clownsoup
2008-02-16 12:03:15

Conclusion:
100 men. 1 very sore woman. Long lines. Everyone unhappy. The art of cunnilingus dies.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
Comment by Gene
2008-02-16 21:41:09

And you suck at history. The one child policy wasn’t in effect at the time this conversation took place.

 
 
Comment by Dygear
2008-02-16 03:27:10

With the way China is exporting products lately, they will all be lesbians.

 
Comment by downloadar
2008-02-16 05:01:51

china has more males because people prefer male children. it gets compounded because of one child policy.

 
Comment by someone
2008-02-16 13:01:53

Well, if they’re virgin and they have a nice round ass (most asians don’t really have a good behind), I’ll take ‘em!

 
Comment by denger
2008-02-16 14:18:49

to Ogopogo

the comment stated by Mao was made 10 years prior to the enactment of the one-child policy, so your comment is not correct - Mao wasn’t an idiot, for that reason (maybe others though). it wasn’t enacted until Dung Xiao Ping’s government, if I remember correctly.

 
Comment by maulee
2008-02-21 05:54:54

yOU SAID “..the promised10 million Chinese women were not given to the US.”
In fact currently there are so many Americans having Chinese girl as their playmate. Look around and you may find millions, if not ten millions.
I guess indirectly, China had keep their promise.

 
Comment by Joseph Leslie
2008-02-22 12:58:44

Henry Kissinger is a groper. One of my friends worked at the Nixon White House and Henry was always groping her.

 
Comment by Pen Is Mightier
2008-02-26 22:15:02

I collected mine a few years back. Already went ahead and made a couple of half-white/half-chinese babies with her. Smoking hot lady, I’ll tell you. She even came with a PhD… probably not the sort Mao wanted to unload. Oh well… his loss. Thanks Mao!

 
Comment by jackie
2008-03-01 22:17:23

so important i felt that i had to repost it… very insightful..; kudos!!! is it happening in the US? I think so.

Comment by Maclover
2008-02-16 11:35:12
Well, maybe he was using one of the oldest and greatest of all known Chinese war strategies. Patience. Many Chinese Emperors and Overlords, when realizing they could not win a direct offensive, would “export” or allow the capture of strongly national women and breed out their enemies over a couple of generations. With the Chinese women teaching their children and grandchildren to be sympathetic and at times completely devoted to their mother/grandmothers homeland.

Then the Emperor, or his son, would take over that territory easily as a majority of the peoples were now willing to follow him

 
Comment by Meg
2008-03-14 09:40:21

Ah-ha! I was wondering how undatable laowai guys could come here and her smoking hot girlfriends! Mao’s plan is working!

 
Comment by MKrary
2008-05-02 19:55:43

why is this important historical news been hidden for so long?

And this is all from Henry Kissinger…”the messenger of death”

How much do I trust this Jew/ CFR?…I think he is lying but with a purpose…for money and oil/ population control

for all I read about him and all his secret trips all over the world to cause death, I don’t believe him a single bit

 
Comment by Swan
2008-05-23 13:08:19

LOL, that’s funny. Too bad they don’t have 10 million girls to spare now. China is trying to get more girls by rewarding families that have female children.

30 million Chinese men will die single and a virgin due to the lack of females. Stupid Chinese traditions! Those boys deserve it for the sins of their parents who killed off their sisters!

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Related Posts from the Past: