Man Loses House and Belongings on Boastful Bet

Xin Liangkun, 53, of Dalian city, boasted on national television that no person could recreate the five-layer ball he spent 10 years to create.

5-balls Man Loses House and Belongings on Boastful Bet picture

“If anyone can reproduce it, I’ll give him my three-story building, and the collections within it.”

The ball is so amazing because all five balls can turn without touching each other.

It took less than six months for Sun Zheng, a young porcelain amateur from Luoyang city, to step up and challenge Xin’s public boast. Sun created the exact same ball and demanded his prize.

“At first he said my replica had internal noise. So I improved the technique, and created a perfect one. Then he said the procedure must have been different.”

So he took Xin to court. The court ruled that Xin’s TV pledge just the same as if he signed a contract, and ordered Xin to give up the house and belongings to Sun.

(中国日报)

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Buzz
  • Reddit
  • bodytext
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Propeller
  • Google
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • E-mail this story to a friend!

RSS feed

32 Comments »

Comment by darkwing duck
2007-08-30 19:36:27

Hey i am not play with that ball. It look like a old version of the hellraiser box.

 
Comment by Allen
2007-08-30 20:21:30

cool man…..i wana see that!!

 
Comment by Heather
2007-08-30 20:24:14

Poor dude, he lost everything.

Comment by zen
2008-01-21 17:30:28

what the fuck, he risked everything with a stupid bet, he deserved it

 
Comment by Chuck
2008-01-21 19:37:09

He did not lose everything…not at all the case. I believe he gained some honesty and humility.

 
 
Comment by chenry
2007-08-30 21:08:53

Just because it took you 10 years to do something doesn’t mean someone smarter can’t do it in less time.

 
Comment by Gwyn
2007-08-30 21:56:22

YO look at his pinky nail.

Comment by nate
2008-01-21 15:51:03

haha, yeah, he snorts coke. Good eyes on that pinky nail. ;)

 
 
Comment by Guy Martin
2007-08-31 02:11:41

What’s so special about this ball? Just sounds like some sort of gyroscope. Anyone know more?

For more wacky news, visit http://www.amusingyou.com/news.htm

 
Comment by SeoulBuffoon
2007-08-31 02:17:46

Ha! The Chinese are as crazy as the Koreans.

 
Comment by paddler
2007-08-31 05:37:11

How is it possible that the balls don’t touch each other? I have an ivory version I picked up in China years ago that is 10 balls deep (saw one that was 100 balls deep) and they touch each other. Wonder what is between them that keeps the spacing?

 
Comment by Trish
2007-08-31 07:40:28

Ah, arrogance. Thy name is “man”.

 
Comment by anonymousgirl
2007-10-09 17:11:26

is that a webcam?!

Comment by Pertrucci
2008-01-23 02:47:05

My thoughts exactly. :D

 
 
Comment by Rick Rodgers
2008-01-21 13:17:13

I would publicly announce this article is bullsh*t!

A television boast is not going to be the same as if he signed a contract at all.

Comment by Dan
2008-01-21 14:56:54

Yea it is, its called a verbal contract. In the US they can hold up in court, and apparently in China they can as well. I really dont get whats so special about the ball, they should explain that part of the article better.

 
Comment by David
2008-01-21 15:22:01

yes rick, it is. this is a prime example of a unilateral contract - a promise for a performance. And as Dan also pointed out oral contracts are just as enforceable as written ones.

 
Comment by Dude
2008-01-27 09:36:56

too bad man, if you say something its the same as if you signed a contract. Hard part is to prove that you promised anything without paper, in this case, he said it in video, so hes busted.

 
Comment by steve webb
2008-02-06 17:15:40

Well it looks as if the court never agreed with you Rick. Oh dear what a shame, now shut up

 
 
Comment by anon
2008-01-21 15:51:48

Long pink nails are indicative of drug use/abuse, most typically cocaine.

Also, I don’t believe a word of this story.

 
Comment by tonupkid
2008-01-21 16:26:23

A long finger nail is quite common on the younger male generation in China. I don’t think that it has anything to do with drugs. Just an afectation-fashion thing, more to do with ‘look at my long nail, no way am I a manual worker’.
Yes. And please someone tell us how these mens balls are so special. And did the first guy loose his balls when his house went, and if so, why the hell does the second guy want the first guys balls. And does first guy now speak with a squeeky voice? Or is that just a load of old balls.

 
Comment by aslothmonk
2008-01-21 16:44:01

My balls are bigger and better than your balls.

 
Comment by tonupkid
2008-01-21 17:25:32

Yeh but mine are quieter and go round and round without touching…. Anything apparently

Comment by James
2008-01-29 13:48:10

Sounds like a personal problem to me…

 
 
Comment by sam
2008-01-21 20:56:36

i have three… :]

 
Comment by Max
2008-01-22 01:14:44

Anyone know of any developments?

 
Comment by Thyhack
2008-01-22 08:46:18

Haha I remember when he finished that ball and he put out the offer. Now it is pretty funny to see that someone actually took up the offer and decided to recreate the ball.

 
Comment by Hyrum
2008-01-24 10:40:08

That is cool. Why did he think no one could do it?

 
Comment by reino
2008-02-01 12:02:58

tonupkid, you are cool, and the balls are pretty odd to say the least

 
Comment by dungo
2008-03-07 14:33:52

all your house are belong to us.

 
Comment by The Baldchemist
2008-03-14 02:41:28

A verbal contract ain’t worth the paper its written on.
But what on Earth was in it for him? If you can do it then the house is yours; if you can’t, then ……what? Dum shit!
The baldchemist - living life in all of its superlatives.

Comment by Jack
2008-04-04 21:52:20

Umm verbal contracts are worth exactly the same as a written contract except in certain circumstances where statutory contract law expressly requires a writing to validate it as is sometimes the case in UCC contract law in the United States. But fundamentally verbal contracts are 100% the same considering they meet the common law definition of a contract with an offer and acceptance.

Also what kind of jerk would take someones house and possessions just because of a stupid challenge like that.

 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Related Posts from the Past: